I'm sorry to say this, but the first game was really bad. Maybe because it didn't have Co-op in it, and now they make a second game with Co-op... I'm not sure how to feel about this.

You see, when I first saw a video of this I thought this is an amazing game, then I heard it doesn't have Co-op. I still tried it out, and while it looked okay, it was very disappointing at the same time. The developers said that we should try out Dungeon Defenders, if we want Co-op. They recommended another game!!!

Nevermind, I tried out Dungeon Defenders, when I thought it's garbage. Oh how big I have failed! It's WAAAAAY better than OMD...

But now I'll try out the demo, and see if it hits the "Okay..." mark.

Well, if we're gonna do the whole DD vs OMD thing, I'll just say that DD is all about loot, while OMD is all about skill. 'Nuff said.

Well I for one really enjoyed the first Orcs Must Die. I liked the humor a lot, though there are some traps/tactics that just plain suck and others that pretty much always win. I even convinced a buddy of mine to buy the first game just for the 10 additional co-op levels so we can play them together in OMD!2.

--- Replying to ipsum -----
Nah, DD is about CO-OP while OMD is not (but it should be). I see what you're saying but I think most people were disappointed by the lack of co-op in the first game. DD filled the void and then some.

Well ipsum if we think it that way, then I love skill based games, but I prefer Co-op ones, with or without skill. Plus with DD I got more content than with OMD