When I saw the first game, I thought it's going to be awesome in Co-op. And then I watched a trailer of Dungeon Defenders, and thought it's a dumb game.

Guess what? OMD1 sucks, and DD rules! Why? Because DD has Co-op and better gameplay elements.

Now OMD2 comes with Co-op. I might just give it a chance, just for the Co-op, but if the game disappoints me, then Co-op can't save it...

Ooo, now this is exciting. I can't wait to get my hands on it at PAX East!

--- Replying to TheReaperCooL -----
Same here... OMD had me a little excited until I read/saw more about DD. While it's nice to see 2 player co-op in OMD2, it's too little too late. Give me at least 4 player please!!!

Well, as a singleplayer game, Orcs Must Die was really fun, and Dungeon Defenders was terrible.

Mind you, DD in co-op is a great deal of fun, but it's just about unplayable as a solo experience.

Orcs Must Die was a ton of fun; one of the best Indie games ever imo. Co-Op should be just what it needs to go from "Good" to "Great".

I'm sad that it's not coming to XBLA, but happy about the co-op.

OMD is a fantastic game, and I'd easily say the mechanics of OMD are much more enjoyable. The exclusion of co-op is unfortunate, but I would suggest not passing it up because of that.