I've said it before and I'll say it again, I'm amazed how such an established company can seem so inept by messing up what seems like the basic stuff.

Ubisoft, like Crytek, seems to be taking up the "Publishers, not Players" flag. Their products continue to disappoint me, and they didn't used to.

So true, and this is the first time I see someone mention it. It's totally ok for new developers to make mistakes or maybe experienced developers creating new kinds of games.. but this is unacceptable and with something so basic as the imput method, even worse.

That day one patch may have fixed some issues that I don't know of however it definitely did not fix connectivity issues after spending 2 hrs "playing" last night and only playing about 30 mins of gameplay I do not feel very impressed with their day one patch.

this is why the only game I'm buying brand new this year will be Borderlands2.. everything else can wait the 6months-1year so that I can get a patched game for dirt cheap on a steam sale..

Im sorry to hear about the PC being buggy. I have it for the PS3 and so far its pretty good control whys. Sometimes ill get stuck on something but other than that its pretty good.

I havent played it online though so i cant vouche for that.

Ubisoft used to be one of my preferred gaming companies. Now I tend to cringe whenever I see that they are developing a new game. This is why.

does any one know of to get more fps in campaign mode because i can run guerrilla mode fine but campaign mode run 12 fps

I kind of see ubisoft and bethesda in the same light.. they both make solid, fun games.. but they are both brutal at porting and beta testing.. I waited until fallout 3 came out with the GOTY edition.. and even it was buggy as heck (I can't imagine the release version).. The only Ubisoft games that I haven't noticed major issues with (other than falling through the floor and out of the world once) are the rainbow six vegas games.. well, unless you call moronic AI a bug..